Thanks but I have been aware of this for most of my life. As the article mentions there two ways of looking at this; the tropical and the sidereal zodiac. Furthermore the signs are just a very small part of astrology. The angular relationships between the planets both by transit and natal chart have not and cannot be disputed.... since they are computed by precise astronomical observation. This is how I do all my readings and predictions—not by ‘signs’ In fact the adjustment of the signs over the years is a fact well documented by Sri Yukteswar way before scientists had any thing to say about it and it is called the procession of the equinoxes and accounts for the changing evolutionary spiritual advancement slowly taking place since 500 A.D. If you are more curious about this-just ask questions. Compared to Hindu cosmology scientists still have only a rudimentary understanding of cosmological knowledge. Even Carl Sagan made this admission in his scientific show-Cosmos- but he erroneously surmised that it was quite by coincidence....when in fact there is a history of science that predates the ignorance of present scientific inquiry based on only empirical investigation and not on self inquiry which the Masters have shown to be superior to material and physical evidence.
I was recently in a coffee shop and the Barista asked me what my sign was. I mentioned that I had read an article which said all of our signs are off by one due to some error. Have you seen this article I'm referring to?
Astrologers and Astronomers have been aware of this for over 100 years now. Kunkle in his claims about a 13th sign is showing his ignorance. There could be even more signs if u want to make more images out of star combinations. He also shows a lack of explanation or understanding of astrology and science as well when he fails to explain the differences between sidereal and tropical astrology. He makes the arbitrary conclusion that the signs have changed. From a tropical point of view they have not changed because it is based on the position of the Sun to the earth...not on the Sun to the stars like the sidereal view looks at.
Hi Steve, have you read about nakshatras in vedic astrology?
